The Burden of Proof on Psychiatric Experts with Regard to Imminent Injury in Civil Commitment Proceedins in Montana

Dr. M. Prabhu & Dr. Charles Dike “The Burden of Proof on Psychiatric Experts with Regard to Imminent Injury in Civil Commitment Proceedins in Montana” (2011) 39:1 Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 123.

Available here Prabhu Dike 2011

Civil Commitment Criteria Clarified: Substance Abuse and Antisocial Personality Disorder Excluded. In re D.M.S, 203 P.3d 776 (Mont. 2009), decided by the Montana Supreme Court on February 18, 2009, was an appeal from an order of the District Court of the Twenty-First Judicial District, Ravalli County, committing D.M.S. to the Montana State Hospital (MSH). The supreme court concluded that the evidence must clearly demonstrate a connection between imminent threat of injury and a recognized mental disorder, “as opposed to alcoholism or antisocial behavior” (D.M.S., p 780).